Daily Archives: January 19, 2015

ECB holds key to Greek developments

arachova

Frankfurt can control the flow of cash in the domestic credit system and therefore the state’s liquidity.Greece is preparing to go to the polls next Sunday with the two larger political parties sharpening their exchanges and making more promises in a bid to boost their election chances. Regardless of who wins and forms a government next week, the key to economic developments in the next few weeks, and perhaps months, is held by the European Central Bank (ECB) – and even more so if the new government is led by the leftist SYRIZA party.

Greece has been unable to collect a total of about 7.3 billion euros from bailout loans and revenue from Greek bonds held by the ECB because the last review of the economic policy program was not successfully concluded on time. Nevertheless, the state has managed to operate smoothly for months because it has tapped domestic liquidity sources.

Indeed, the state has been kept afloat by intra-governmental borrowing through repo (repurchase agreements) operations to the tune of 9 billion euros according to government sources. The central administration uses state assets as collateral to draw on this excess liquidity from general government subsectors, i.e. social security funds, state organizations etc, which amounted to about 13 billion euros last September.

If the repayment of this borrowing is rolled over, this repo framework will become an actual funding source in 2015-2016. The central administration could also use idle cash resources deposited in local commercial banks by the same or other parts of the general government for liquidity purposes. The exact amount of these cash resources has not been made public. When asked, one official put it a 2 billion euros, while another spoke of “several billion euros.”

In addition, the state had borrowed temporarily some 2.5 billion euros out of about 11.3 billion left over from the recapitalization of the Greek banking system, according to one of officials.

Nevertheless, the stalemate with the official lenders could go on longer if no new government is formed and the country holds a second round of elections within a month or a new government is formed and enters into lengthy negotiations with the country’s creditors. Although the first outcome is possible, the second is more likely. Especially if a SYRIZA-led government takes over and refuses to negotiate with the troika, seeking instead “political negotiations,” with all issues back on the table.

SYRIZA officials have repeatedly said they reject the program and will not honor it. Whether this is simply a pre-election tactic to win over more voters fed up with years of austerity or the main policy plank remains to be seen. We believe these officials express the party’s line on the issue. In that case, the state will not be able to count on more bailout loans to keep on going and will have to rely more on domestic borrowing or/and higher taxes.

Since the available cash resources will be fully utilized in February, according to experts, and help from the fiscal side, namely the primary surplus, will likely be limited, the new government will have to turn to the banks for extra funding.

SYRIZA officials have hinted at issuing more T-bills to satisfy borrowing needs, if necessary, as long as negotiations with the lenders go on.

Of course, there is an agreement that the outstanding stock of T-bills cannot exceed the amount of 15 billion euros. Nevertheless, the ECB allowed this limit to be surpassed by 3 billion or more in August 2012 to help Greece repay maturing bonds mostly held by the ECB at the time. So, it is possible to see a repetition of that this summer when other Greek bonds held by the Eurosystem expire.

However, the state will likely have greater borrowing needs in the meantime and may want to sell more T-bills to local banks to pay part of its bills. That’s where the ECB comes in. Although it will be impossible for the governing council of the European Central Bank to refuse Greek banks access to loans from the Bank of Greece’s emergency liquidity assistance (ELA), it can impose an upper limit on the amount of T-bills each local bank holds.

Bankers say the ECB could send a letter to each of the local credit institutions to that end and they certainly know more about this issue. It is reminded the ECB has been the regulator of Greece’s four largest banks since last November.

Bankers say that the ECB is entitled to do this if it thinks there is a risk management issue. Still, this is a politically sensitive issue in our view. It is estimated the four major banks hold Greek government debt to the tune of 20 billion euros or so, which is not far from their total share capital.

Something like this could change the landscape since the state could not count on extra T-bill issuance to cover its funding needs.

Undoubtedly, this is more likely if the Greek program is not extended and is more important than buying bonds from Greek banks when the awaited QE (Quantitative Easing) scheme is announced on Thursday. This is why we say the ECB holds the key to future economic and other developments in the country.

source: ekathimerini.com

Socceroos Asian Cup semi-final won’t be moved to Sydney despite Hunter Stadium limitations

Hunter Stadium, which hosted the Japan v Palestine match earlier in the tournament, is operating at the reduced capacity of 23,000 for the Asian Cup

Hunter Stadium, which hosted the Japan v Palestine match earlier in the tournament, is operating at the reduced capacity of 23,000 for the Asian Cup Photo: Ryan Osland

A potential Asian Cup semi-final involving Australia appears certain to remain in Newcastle instead of Sydney despite Hunter Stadium’s already limited capacity being reduced by nearly a third for the tournament.

The Asian Football Confederation has an exclusive tenancy deal with Stadium Australia for the duration of the tournament and would be free to move a high-profile semi-final involving the host nation to the 83,000 capacity venue. The  local organising committee in conjunction with the AFC have not looked into the possibility of moving a semi-final involving the Socceroos to Stadium Australia to accommodate up to 60,000 more fans in what would likely be a sell-out fixture.

After finishing second in their group to South Korea, Australia will play China in the quarter-final where they will have a chance to play either Japan, Iran or the UAE in a semi-final held at Newcastle, where capacity restrictions are in place. In accordance with FIFA World Cup regulations, the AFC have so far prevented the local organising committee from selling tickets to the two non-seated hills behind the goals at Hunter Stadium, which reduces the capacity of the venue from 33,000 to approximately 23,000.

Should the two organising committees of the tournament move a potential Australia semi-final to ANZ Stadium, it would likely provide the local organising committee about $500,000 in additional gate takings as well as the opportunity to allow more fans to watch a historic match. However, the short turnaround of just five days between the quarter-final and the semi-final are proving a deterrent to  moving what could be the biggest match of the competition, a potential clash between Australia and Japan, or Australia and Iran.

The local organising committee claims it would be a logistical nightmare to rearrange issues of ticket exchanges, broadcasting, travel arrangements, accommodation, staff and other requirements in just five days.

Questions have been raised as to why the Hunter Stadium  – the smallest stadium by capacity for the tournament – will host potentially the most high-profile match of the Asian Cup. The state governments were invited to bid for games in packages, with NSW purchasing the rights for all semi-finals, the third v fourth play-off and the Asian Cup final. The Victorian government did not bid for anything further than a quarter-final due to hosting the Australian Open, which clashes with the latter stages of the Asian Cup. The Queensland government did not battle NSW for the rights to host the final four games of the tournament.

“We had an agreement with governments that we would have a rotating draw so teams travelled, that was fundamental to the funding agreement. We made a decision to take 4 games to Newcastle, and we had 11 at Sydney, as NSW paid the most money to have the games at this tournament,” Asian Cup 2015 chief executive, Michael Brown, said.

It was decided not to host more than 11 games at ANZ Stadium due to venue congestion and the organisers confirmed they did not plan for Australia to finish second in their group and face playing a semi-final in Newcastle. However, if Australia does reach that stage, the local organising committee might construct temporary seating on the hills behind both goals to increase the capacity for a match where demand will exceed supply.

“We’re looking at every option for the two grass areas at Newcastle we can put temporary seating on. We’re working with a couple of companies  to work out costs, food, toilets, disabled seating, sight restrictions, and we have to work out if it’s going to be beneficial. We’ll be working through that, I’m not sure if we would have needed them if Australia doesn’t beat China,” Brown said.

source:brisbanetimes.com.au