Prime Minister Tony Abbott has defended high spending levels revealed in last night’s budget and rejected the idea it has been designed to take the Government to an early election.
Multi-billion-dollar packages to boost small business and alleviate childcare costs formed the bedrock of the Abbott Government’s second budget, prompting speculation from some independent MPs that the Coalition is preparing to go to the polls ahead of time.
But this morning Mr Abbott said it was his “plan” to serve the full three-year term.
Deficit forecast
| 2015-16 | 2016-17 | 2017-18 | 2018-19 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $35.1 billion | $25.8 billion | $14.4 billion | $6.9 billion | $82.3 billion |
When asked on AM if it was an election budget, Mr Abbott replied “it’s a budget for the Australian people”.
Earlier he had laughingly called it a budget aimed at “Tony’s tradies” – echoing the term “Howard’s battlers” that described the so-called aspirational voters who backed former prime minister John Howard.
Tradies will benefit from the $1.8 billion instant asset write-off measure, which will apply to any item valued at less than $20,000 and bought by a small business.
The budget has revealed that government spending levels have not been trimmed under the Coalition, still sitting at 26.2 per cent of GDP – a level it has been at for two years.
It also hit that high when the Labor government was spending up on stimulus packages to try to fend off the global financial crisis, and under the Howard government in the midst of the mid-90s mining boom.
But the Prime Minister said the budget was “right for these times”.
“We are doing the responsible thing under the circumstances that we find ourselves in,” he said – a line he repeated several times.
“We’ve got a credible path back to surplus.
“We inherited a deficit of $48 billion and every year the deficit comes down by about a half a per cent of GDP and I think under the circumstances that’s a very good result.”
Mr Abbott also defended his Government’s spending record, saying that under Labor expenditure was growing at 3.7 per cent, while under the Coalition spending had been reined in to 1.5 per cent growth.
But budget expert Chris Richardson from Deloitte Access Economics said the Prime Minister was “not comparing apples with apples”.
“This Government has done a lot, but that comparison exaggerates what they’ve achieved,” he said.
“He’s comparing spending over different time periods.
“Most importantly, the one includes six years of NDIS [National Disability Insurance Scheme], and the other includes one year of a mature NDIS.”
When the disparity was put to Mr Abbott this morning, he said “I don’t accept that”.
And he dismissed the Coalition’s apparent abandonment of the rhetoric of a “budget emergency” used before the election, saying it had been alleviated by a “change of government”.
Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said Labor could not accept the “trickery” in the budget, though the small business package will have Labor’s support.
He said Labor was ready to fight an election and pointed to the $80 billion cut to schools and hospitals funding for the states outlined in last year’s budget, and beginning to show in the figures for this year’s budget, as a “disaster”.
“You’re going to lose $80 billion worth of schools and hospitals – yep, I call [the budget] unfair,” he said.
But Mr Shorten stopped short of saying a Labor government would reinstate the funding.
The Prime Minister is certainly standing by the cuts, and gearing up for a lasting stoush with state and territory leaders.
“We made certain commitments in last year’s budget and those commitments carry over into this year’s budget,” Mr Abbott said.
Late last night, New South Wales Liberal Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian released a statement saying she was “deeply concerned” about the cuts.
source:abc.net.au

















