Daily Archives: July 9, 2016

Παγκόσμιο Χρυσό για κρασί Έλληνα παραγωγού από Αυστραλία

paAward1

O Δημήτρης Μαρκέας με ένα από τα βραβευμένα κρασιά του, P&E Markeas Shiraz

Υψηλότατες διακρίσεις για κρασιά της οικογένειας Μαρκέα από την Νότια Αυστραλία

Ήταν η πέμπτη συνεχή χρονιά που τα κρασιά της οικογένειας Μαρκέα από την Νότια Αυστραλία απέσπασαν σημαντικότατες διακρίσεις διεθνές διαγωνισμό κρασιού. 

Η ποικιλία Chardonnay της χρονιάς 2016 της οινοποιίας Mallee Estate του ελληνικής καταγωγής οινοπαραγωγού Δημήτρης Μαρκέας απέσπασε το Χρυσό Βραβείο στον Διεθνή Διαγωνισμό Οίνου της Νέας Υόρκης. Η συγκεκριμένη ποικιλία είναι από αμπέλια που φυτεύτηκαν το 1978 στο οικογενειακό αμπελώνα. 

Επιπλέον, οι ποικιλίες Cabernet Sauvignon του 2014 και P&E Shiraz του 2010 απέσπασαν τα αργυρά βραβεία στον ίδιο διαγωνισμό. 

Τα κρασιά της οινοποιείας Μαρκέα έχουν συμμετάσχει επανειλημμένα στους Διαγωνισμούς Οίνου στη Νέα Υόρκη, σχεδόν κάθε χρόνο από το 2010 μέχρι σήμερα και έχουν λάβει υψηλές βαθμολογίες. 

Ο κ. Μαρκέας διαχειρίζεται το οινοποιείο Mallee Estate Winery, το οποίο ίδρυσαν οι γονείς του Παναγιώτης και Ελένη Μαρκέα το 1969. Η οικογένεια κατάγεται από την Καρδαμύλη Μεσσηνίας και εγκαταστάθηκε στην εύκρατη ηλιόλουστη περιοχή του ποταμού Murray της Νότιας Αυστραλίας. 

Το 1998 η οικογένεια αγόρασε ένα μεγάλο κομμάτι γης στην ίδια περιοχή και την ίδια περίοδο ο Δημήτρης αποφασίσει να ακολουθήσει σπουδές Οινολογίας στο Πανεπιστήμιο Charles Sturt της Νέας Νότιας Ουαλίας. Μαζί με τον αδερφό του, Θανάση, κατάφεραν να μετατρέψουν τους αμπελώνες σε ένα πρότυπο οινοποιείο. 

Η επαρχία Riverland είναι σήμερα η μεγαλύτερη σε έκταση περιοχή παραγωγής κρασιού στην Αυστραλία. Το κλίμα είναι ζεστό ηπειρωτικό και η μέση θερμοκρασία το χειμώνα φτάνει τους 16 βαθμούς και το καλοκαίρι τους 30. Η περιοχή θεωρείται το «μηχανοστάσιο» παραγωγής κρασιού στην Αυστραλία καθώς εκεί παράγονται μερικά από τα πιο δημοφιλή κρασιά της χώρας. Η οινοποιεία σήμερα εξάγει ποσότητες κρασιού στις ΗΠΑ και στην Κίνα. 

Πηγή:Νέος Κόσμος

Old vines and new wines: Greek grapes making a splash in Australia

wine-tasting

A whiskey and beer enthusiast sold on Greek wine at a Japanese dinner

Venue: Supernormal, 180 Flinders Lane, Melbourne

So this is what it has come to. A delegation of Greek winemakers, here in Australia, finest wares in tow, matching their potations to a selection of Asian fusion cuisine. Could there be a more apt city than Melbourne for such a clash of west-meets-east? Given the enormous Greek and Asian populations present, it’s a surprise this isn’t a more frequent occurrence.

And here I am. A half-Asian (less so “fusion”, more so “confusion”) and sometime-contributor to a Greek publication, who admittedly has a stronger inclination to whisky and craft beer, and whose main experiences with Greek libations have been less-than-ideal encounters with ouzo during a European backpacking trip. Can an old dog learn new drinks?

New Wines of Greece is an initiative of the Greek wine industry supported by the European Union and the Greek government (I think we can agree that wine is the great unifier), with the campaign making its second visit to Australian shores in June for a series of tastings, masterclasses and dinners. The venue for this evening was Supernormal, the Flinders Lane establishment that is decidedly Japanese in aesthetics but whose culinary scope extends far beyond.

I find myself seated next to Effie, an oenologist who also happens to be the export face of Lyrarakis Wines, one of the largest producers in Crete. She explains that the Lyrarakis Plyto, accompanying the starters, has been selling particularly well in Japan over the past six months, but she is yet to venture to the far east to investigate further. Thus, it seems fortuitous that Supernormal was chosen for the evening’s nosh; whether it be beer, sake, whisky or otherwise, Japanese tastes (without wanting to generalise here too broadly) often lean towards styles that show sufficient restraint in palate and alcohol in order to complement the fresh and subtle flavours within many of their local dishes, but also possess enough depth to be an experience of their own. 

Many of the Greek wines up for tasting this evening certainly meet this criteria.

As it turns out, the grassy citrus character of Lyrarakis Plyto paired up wonderfully with a series of light and tangy starters including pickled vegetables, oysters, kingfish and marinated cuttlefish – but so too did a renowned varietal in the form of Troupis Winery’s “Fteri” Moschofilero, delivering a crisp, mineral flavour enveloped in a rosy bouquet.

Following on, the entree contained one of Supernormal’s iconic dishes – the straightforward but devilishly moreish New England lobster roll, together with the reputable and reliable prawn and chicken dumplings. The Ktima Pavlidis “Thema” White blend of 50 per cent assyrtiko and 50 per cent sauvignon blanc added a dollop of fresh fruitiness to the palate, and is a great option for those who would usually reach for a NZ white blend full of melon and passionfruit.

From listening in to conversation amongst the attendees and sampling the offerings, it’s something of a mystery that Greek wines haven’t carved out a bit more real estate amongst the shelves of Australia’s liquor retailers and in the minds of consumers, especially with a history of winemaking dating back more than 6000 years. As Australians we obviously look to local and Kiwi producers when seeking bang for buck, and when we’re feeling a bit adventurous we often turn to the usual suspects in Western Europe and South America.

Greek wines may face competition purely from a cost perspective, but when you lay down your cash you know you will be getting something different, something set apart from a global varietal homogeneity, something distinctly Greek.

Anyway, following some vigorous discussion around the table on topics such as the merits of organic wine, the main course took us to inland China for a handsome slab of slow-cooked Szechuan lamb, falling apart with the barest of effort, accompanied by spring onion pancakes and coriander paste.

Flying the flag for Greece were a number of reds, including one that was certainly one of my evening’s highlights – the Boutari Grande Reserve Naoussa, a rich (but not needlessly heavy) 100 per cent xinomavro full of woods and red fruits, and enough spice and acidity to hold its own alongside the meat. Another one to rock my proverbial boat was the Theopetra Estate Limniona, possessing an earthy spice but softer on the tannins and acidity than the Boutari.

Admittedly I was looking forward to one of the the dessert wines; specifically, the Domaine Sigalas Vinsanto, composed of 75 per cent assyrtiko and 25 per cent aidani from old, old vines and aged for 24 months in oak barrels. Simply exquisite. Domaine Sigalas happens to be located near the town of Oia in northern Santorini, yet despite spending a week lazing around in Oia in 2014 I was somehow foolish enough to overlook a visit to their grounds – certainly a missed opportunity to be rectified on a future occasion.

The evening ended with something of a curious treat. Peter Barry, manager of Jim Barry Wines, distributed tastings of his 2015 Assyrtiko, having started the crop on his Clare Valley estate a few years ago with cuttings taken from a single Santorini vine. Whilst somewhat still in its infancy, over time it will interesting to see how the grapes take to the local climate, and to compare the results to that of its homeland. And just to outdo himself, Peter produced a 2002 bottle of The Armagh to ration out amongst the table. Even a self-professed beer-guzzling philistine like myself had reason to pause and acknowledge the heft of this indulgence. In short, I absolutely rue the fact that I was so woefully ignorant on the breadth, depth, and distinctness of Greek wines prior to this event. 

Whilst innumerable winemakers across the globe will continue to produce readily available mainstays such as riesling, shiraz, and pinot noir, there is a place out there in everyone’s cellar and on everyone’s table for xinomavro, moschofilero, plyto, and so on; this is a slice of pure Greece. Peter Barry lamented that it’s “a story and a world of complexity that nobody knows about” – well, hopefully the New Wines of Greece campaign will ensure those words no longer hold true in the near future.

For more information on the New Wines of Greece campaign and Greek wines in general, head to: www.newwinesofgreece.com

Source:neos kosmos

Telstra axes 326 staff at customer centres, sends more jobs offshore

4e9e8eed71fb75ed8c7dcb1d46750de4

Telstra chief executive Andrew Penn. Picture: Stuart McEvoy

Telstra is sending more jobs to The Philippines, with the telco taking an axe to its contact centre and Telstra Business units.

The company has confirmed 326 roles will go as part of its ­latest measure to streamline ­operations. But another 150 jobs could be cut in the coming weeks, according to the Community and Public Sector Union.

CPSU spokeswoman Teresa Davison told The Weekend Australian there was still some confusion over how many jobs Telstra may end up shedding.

“I don’t think there’s a lot of co-ordination inside Telstra, and no one knows how the different units work with each other,” Ms Davison said.

Telstra maintains the cuts are necessary to remove back-office duplication and improve customer experience.

But Ms Davison said Telstra customers would be justified in asking how moving jobs overseas would improve service.

A Telstra spokesman said the streamlining of back-office functions and the resultant job cuts were a reflection of how customers were interacting with the telco. “With 50 per cent of our customers engaging with us online, some functions are increasingly no longer required,” he said. “You no longer need to ring a call centre to pay your bill or check how much data you have already used.”

The bulk of the jobs axed are from Telstra’s Perth and Melbourne customer service centres, and come less than a week after the telco’s network suffered its seventh outage in five months.

While the disruption was localised to Victoria it was severe enough to disrupt the operations of a number of Telstra’s business customers on the last day of the financial year.

The cuts also come at a time when overall customer satisfaction with the telco is on the nose.

In May, Telstra chief executive Andrew Penn said the telco was unlikely to meet its full-year NPS target of +12, and said staff bonus incentives, which are tied to customer satisfaction levels, would suffer as a result.

“For employees in our network services business unit (NSBU), it is a similar situation, with the April result down two points from March to -6,” Mr Penn said.

“It is also therefore likely that all of us eligible for the Telstra or NSBU short-term incentive or annual bonus schemes will not receive the NPS-based component of our plans.”

NPS is an established measure of customer loyalty.

source:theaustralian.com.au

No, Mr Blair, the world is not safer after Saddam

untitled

The fallout from the Iraq inquiry in the Chilcot Report, as it is publicly known, echoed across the world after being revealed by Sir John Chilcot on July 6.

The report from inquiry into Britain’s involvement in the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the aftermath essentially stated the following:

1)That former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did not pose an urgent threat to the interests of the United Kingdom;
2)The intelligence regarding the alleged weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Saddam’s hands was presented with too much certainty;
3)Peaceful alternatives to war had not been exhausted;
4)The U.K. and the U.S. together undermined the authority of the United Nations Security Council;
5)The process of identifying the legal basis for the military action was far from satisfactory;
6)The 2003 invasion of Iraq and the war was unnecessary.

The British prime minister of the time, Tony Blair, who has come under the spotlight once again with the Chilcot report, said he was sorry about the losses of the war but that he would take the same decision today again if he had the power because, he claimed, the world was a safer place after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

First of all, the report itself is a successful example of a working, pluralistic democracy in the U.K. It is no secret that British governments have been trying to stop the public release of the contents of the report since it was commissioned by former PM Gordon Brown in June 2009. The U.S. administration has signaled that the release of it, especially the conversations between Blair and former U.S. President George W. Bush, could harm the strategic relations between the two countries. Yet it appears that Chilcot only agreed to reveal it after the parliamentary elections on May 15, possibly in order to avoid interfering in current politics. It is difficult to think about the establishment of a similar inquiry in Turkey, as well as the release of a similar report, in spite of government pressure.

But no, Mr. Blair, the world is not a safer place after the fall of Saddam Hussein.

On the contrary, the world is a much more dangerous place in which to live with the spread of terrorism to a global scale, putting the lives of every person in every corner of the world at risk.

As a brief aside, one has to recall the answer of then-U.S. Secretary of State and former Chief of Staff Colin Powell to Barbara Walters of ABC TV on Sept. 9, 2005. “My involvement in the invasion of Iraq,” Powell said, “was a permanent blot on my record.” He was certainly referring to his Feb. 5, 2003, presentation to the U.N. about the evidence on Iraq’s arsenal of WMD threatening the Middle East and the world. 

The so-called evidence was a piece of information given by a young Iraqi chemical engineer, Rafed Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, who had asked for asylum from Germany back in 1999 (because of embezzlement charges). The findings were deemed unsatisfying by the German intelligence BND but were shared with the AmericanCIA in the hectic atmosphere of al-Qaeda’s 9/11 attacks. That information was not fully reliable for both the CIA and MI6 either. That “evidence” about the WMD arsenal of Saddam Hussein was also not confirmed by the statements of either Naji Sabri, Iraq’s former foreign minister (who defected to the Americans), to the CIA, or Iraq’s former intelligence chief, Tahir Habbush al-Tikriti (who defected to the British), to the MI6.

But both Bush and his strategic ally, Blair, decided to rely on this information to start the invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003. Al-Janabi confessed in 2011 that he had simply lied about Iraq’s WMD program, as he was after a Green Card. That’s why Powell (an honorable man who I am pleased to have met personally and talked to about the issue later on) was so embarrassed to be put in such a position by Bush, without knowing at the time that the findings were fabricated in order to justify a war. 

Those responsible were no one but the influential names of the Bush administration like Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, Zalmay Khalilzad, Elliot Abrams and the president’s brother, Jeb Bush, who were among the signatories of a letter by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a group of powerful neo-con Republicans. The group had announced itself on June 3, 1997; on Jan. 26, 1998, they wrote a letter to Democrat President Bill Clinton, pledging support if he moved to overthrow Saddam Hussein of Iraq, which might be an obstacle on the U.S. road to becoming a global power in the 21st century due to its capacity of WMDs.

The PNAC faded out in 2006. Its spokesman, Gary Schmitt, said the neo-con power club PNAC had “already done its job,” since their “view has been adopted.”

By pure coincidence or not, that was the year when Saddam, after being captured by U.S. troops in 2003, was executed on Dec. 30 on the charges of sending Shiite insurgents to death. Earlier that year, following the killing of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the Jordanian leader of the Iraqi (or rather Mesopotamian) branch of al-Qaeda, Sunni radical groups merged to form the “Islamic State of Iraq” under Abu Omar al-Baghdadi. Al-Baghdadi is the current leader of the organization known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL), or Daesh with its Arabic initials, which announced its establishment in January 2013 during the civil war in Syria after decoupling itself from al-Qaeda.

Like Taliban and al-Qaeda being the by-products of the U.S.-led projects to counter the Russian invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, ISIL is a by-product of the U.S.-led and U.K.-backed invasion of Iraq in 2003. Now terrorists belonging to those organizations, agitated by the most extreme form of religious fanaticism, are threatening the entire world amid a deadly competition with each other.

Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator who oppressed the majority of people in Iraq. But no, Mr. Blair, neither Iraq, nor the Middle East, nor the world is a safer place after Saddam.

source: hurriyetdailynews.com